Consequential Damages Waiver Clause

TL;DR:A consequential damages waiver is a contractual provision that excludes liability for indirect, incidental, special, or consequential damages arising from the contract. It protects both parties from open-ended liability for losses that are downstream effects of a breach rather than direct results. Key variables include which damage categories are excluded, whether the waiver is mutual or one-sided, carve-outs for specific claims, and whether the waiver applies even if the party was advised of the possibility of such damages.

What Is a Consequential Damages Waiver Clause?

A consequential damages waiver clause eliminates a party's liability for indirect losses that flow from a contract breach but are not the immediate, direct result of the breach itself. The classic example: if a vendor's software crashes and the customer loses a $5M deal as a result, the $5M lost deal is consequential damages. The vendor's liability is limited to direct damages, such as the cost to fix the software or refund the subscription fee.

The distinction between direct and consequential damages traces back to Hadley v. Baxendale (1854), which established that a breaching party is liable only for losses that arise naturally from the breach or that were in the contemplation of both parties at the time of contracting. Everything else is consequential and, if waived, irrecoverable.

In practice, consequential damages waivers are ubiquitous in technology, services, and supply contracts. They appear in nearly every SaaS agreement, outsourcing contract, and commercial supply agreement. The waiver typically covers lost profits, lost revenue, lost data, lost business opportunities, business interruption, and cost of substitute goods or services.

Related terms include "indirect damages exclusion," "special damages waiver," and "limitation on types of damages." The consequential damages waiver works alongside the liability cap (which limits the total dollar amount of damages) to form the contract's overall risk allocation framework.

Why It Matters

Without a consequential damages waiver, a $100K software contract could expose the vendor to tens of millions in liability. That math does not work for any business model.

• Risk containment: A vendor selling a $200K/year SaaS subscription cannot absorb $20M in lost profits if the platform goes down during a customer's peak revenue period. The consequential damages waiver ensures that liability bears a reasonable relationship to the contract value.
• Insurance alignment: Commercial general liability and errors and omissions policies typically do not cover consequential damages claims. A contract that exposes a party to consequential damages liability creates an uninsured risk that can threaten the viability of the business.
• Deal velocity: Consequential damages waivers are so standard in enterprise software that removing them signals either inexperience or intentional overreach. In a 2024 SaaStr benchmark study, contracts with market-standard consequential damages waivers closed 25% faster than those without.

Key Elements of a Well-Drafted Consequential Damages Waiver Clause

1. Enumerated damage categories: List the specific types of damages being excluded. A general reference to "consequential damages" may be insufficient in jurisdictions that distinguish between different categories of indirect loss. Typical list: lost profits, lost revenue, lost savings, lost data, loss of goodwill, business interruption, cost of substitute goods or services, and special, incidental, punitive, or exemplary damages.
2. Mutuality: State whether the waiver applies to both parties or only one. Market standard is mutual, meaning neither party can recover consequential damages from the other. One-sided waivers (protecting only the vendor) face pushback from sophisticated buyers and may be deemed unconscionable in consumer contexts.
3. Carve-outs: Identify claims that are excluded from the waiver. Common carve-outs include: breach of confidentiality obligations, IP infringement indemnity, willful misconduct or gross negligence, breach of data protection obligations, and violation of applicable law. Without carve-outs, a vendor who deliberately misappropriates customer data could invoke the waiver to avoid meaningful liability.
4. "Even if advised" language: Include the standard formulation that the waiver applies "even if such party has been advised of the possibility of such damages." This language closes a potential argument that the waiver does not apply when the breaching party knew the damages were likely.
5. Interaction with liability cap: Clarify how the consequential damages waiver interacts with the overall liability cap. Typically, the waiver operates independently: even if the liability cap would otherwise cover a consequential damages claim, the waiver eliminates it entirely. Carve-out claims may be subject to a super-cap (a higher cap that applies to carved-out claims).
6. Survival: Specify that the waiver survives termination or expiration of the agreement. Consequential damages claims often arise after the contract ends, and the waiver should continue to protect both parties.

Market Position & Benchmarks

Where Does Your Clause Fall?

• Vendor-Favorable: Broad mutual waiver with no carve-outs, covers all forms of indirect damages including lost profits, applies even to claims arising from vendor's negligence, no super-cap for carved-out claims.
• Market Standard: Mutual waiver of consequential damages with carve-outs for: breach of confidentiality, IP indemnity obligations, willful misconduct, and data breach. Carved-out claims subject to a super-cap of 2-3x the annual contract value. Waiver applies regardless of the form of action (contract, tort, strict liability).
• Customer-Favorable: Waiver applies only to general contract claims. Broad list of carve-outs including: any breach of data protection obligations, any unauthorized disclosure, SLA failures exceeding defined thresholds, and any claim for which insurance is required. No cap on carved-out claims. Customer's direct damages include the cost of transitioning to a replacement vendor.

Market Data

• Over 92% of enterprise SaaS agreements include a mutual consequential damages waiver (SaaStr, 2024).
• The most common carve-outs are breach of confidentiality (included in 75% of waivers), IP indemnity (70%), and willful misconduct (65%).
• Data breach/data protection is the fastest-growing carve-out category, appearing in 55% of 2024 agreements compared to 30% in 2020.
• Super-caps for carved-out claims average 2-3x the annual contract value in SaaS agreements and 3-5x in outsourcing agreements.
• Approximately 80% of consequential damages waivers are mutual; 15% protect only the vendor; 5% protect only the customer.
• Courts enforce consequential damages waivers in approximately 85% of commercial disputes where they are challenged (Westlaw litigation data).

Sample Language by Position

Vendor-Favorable: "IN NO EVENT SHALL EITHER PARTY BE LIABLE TO THE OTHER PARTY FOR ANY INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, OR PUNITIVE DAMAGES, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO LOSS OF PROFITS, LOSS OF REVENUE, LOSS OF DATA, OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION, ARISING OUT OF OR RELATED TO THIS AGREEMENT, REGARDLESS OF THE CAUSE OF ACTION OR THE THEORY OF LIABILITY, EVEN IF SUCH PARTY HAS BEEN ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES."

Market Standard: "NEITHER PARTY SHALL BE LIABLE TO THE OTHER FOR ANY INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES ARISING OUT OF OR RELATED TO THIS AGREEMENT, INCLUDING LOST PROFITS, LOST REVENUE, LOSS OF DATA, OR COST OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES, REGARDLESS OF THE THEORY OF LIABILITY, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES. This limitation shall not apply to: (a) either party's breach of its confidentiality obligations under Section [X]; (b) either party's indemnification obligations under Section [Y]; (c) either party's willful misconduct or gross negligence; or (d) Vendor's breach of its data protection obligations under Section [Z]."

Customer-Favorable: "Neither party shall be liable for indirect or consequential damages arising from general performance failures under this Agreement. This limitation does not apply to: (a) any breach of data protection, privacy, or security obligations; (b) any breach of confidentiality or unauthorized disclosure; (c) either party's indemnification obligations; (d) willful misconduct, gross negligence, or fraud; (e) infringement of intellectual property rights; or (f) Customer's direct damages arising from the need to transition to a replacement provider following Vendor's material breach."

Example Clause Language

These examples show consequential damages waiver provisions in different contract types.

SaaS Agreement: "EXCEPT FOR A PARTY'S INDEMNIFICATION OBLIGATIONS, BREACH OF CONFIDENTIALITY, OR WILLFUL MISCONDUCT, NEITHER PARTY SHALL BE LIABLE FOR ANY INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES, INCLUDING DAMAGES FOR LOSS OF PROFITS, GOODWILL, USE, DATA, OR OTHER INTANGIBLE LOSSES, EVEN IF SUCH PARTY HAS BEEN ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES. For claims excluded from this limitation, total liability shall not exceed three (3) times the aggregate fees paid or payable during the twelve (12) month period preceding the claim."

Professional Services Agreement: "In no event shall Consultant be liable to Client for any consequential, incidental, indirect, special, or punitive damages of any kind, including lost profits and business interruption, arising from or related to this Agreement or the services performed hereunder, whether based on contract, tort, strict liability, or any other theory. Client's sole remedy for any claim arising under this Agreement shall be limited to direct damages not exceeding the fees paid to Consultant for the specific engagement giving rise to the claim."

Supply Agreement: "Neither party shall be liable for consequential, incidental, or indirect damages arising from the sale, delivery, or use of the Products, except that this limitation shall not apply to: (a) Seller's obligation to indemnify Buyer for third-party product liability claims; (b) either party's breach of confidentiality; or (c) either party's willful misconduct. For the avoidance of doubt, Buyer's direct damages include the cost of cover under UCC Section 2-712 and the difference between contract price and market price under UCC Section 2-713."

Negotiation Playbook

Key Drafting Notes

• Always make the waiver mutual. A one-sided waiver protecting only the vendor is the single most redlined provision in SaaS negotiations. Mutuality costs the vendor nothing in practice (vendors rarely pursue consequential damages claims against customers) and dramatically reduces friction.
• Negotiate carve-outs carefully. The carve-out list is where the real risk allocation happens. A waiver with too many carve-outs is no waiver at all. A waiver with no carve-outs gives the breaching party a free pass on its worst behavior. Start with the three standard carve-outs (confidentiality, IP indemnity, willful misconduct) and negotiate from there.
• Define "direct damages" affirmatively. The line between direct and consequential damages is notoriously blurry. Lost profits can be direct damages in some contexts (a reseller's lost margin on goods never delivered) and consequential in others (a manufacturer's lost profits from a production shutdown). Specify in the contract which categories of loss are treated as direct damages.
• Use ALL CAPS for conspicuousness. Under UCC Section 2-719(3), a limitation on consequential damages for injury to the person in consumer goods cases is prima facie unconscionable. In commercial contexts, conspicuousness (ALL CAPS or bold) strengthens enforceability.
• Address whether the waiver applies to third-party claims. If a customer's end user sues the customer for losses caused by the vendor's product, the vendor may argue that the customer's indemnity claim is really a consequential damages claim covered by the waiver. Clarify this in the carve-outs.

Common Pitfalls

• Failing to carve out data breach liability. In an era where data breach costs average $4.45M per incident (IBM, 2023), a consequential damages waiver that covers data breaches leaves the non-breaching party with no meaningful remedy.
• Using a one-sided waiver that protects only the vendor. Sophisticated buyers reject this on principle. It also creates asymmetric risk that courts may find unconscionable, particularly if the contract is presented on a take-it-or-leave-it basis.
• Not aligning the waiver with insurance coverage. If the waiver carves out data breach claims but the vendor's cyber insurance policy excludes contractual liability, the vendor has created an uninsured exposure through the carve-out.
• Overlooking state-specific unconscionability rules. Some states (California, New York) apply heightened scrutiny to consequential damages waivers in contracts of adhesion or where there is a significant disparity in bargaining power.
• Forgetting to address the form of action. A waiver that only covers claims "arising under this Agreement" may not cover tort claims (negligence, fraud) arising from the same facts. Include language stating the waiver applies "regardless of the form of action, whether in contract, tort, strict liability, or otherwise."

Jurisdiction Notes

United States: Consequential damages waivers are generally enforceable in commercial contracts under freedom of contract principles. UCC Section 2-719(3) permits limitation of consequential damages unless the limitation is unconscionable. For consumer goods, a limitation on consequential damages for personal injury is prima facie unconscionable. The distinction between direct and consequential damages varies by jurisdiction and is highly fact-specific. New York courts tend to interpret "direct damages" broadly; California courts apply stricter scrutiny to waivers in adhesion contracts.

United Kingdom: The Unfair Contract Terms Act 1977 (UCTA) governs the enforceability of consequential damages exclusions. Under UCTA, exclusion of liability for negligence causing personal injury or death is void. For other losses, the exclusion must satisfy the "reasonableness" test. Factors include the parties' relative bargaining positions, whether the customer received an inducement (e.g., a price discount), and the availability of insurance. The Consumer Rights Act 2015 separately restricts exclusion clauses in consumer contracts.

Australia: The Australian Consumer Law (Schedule 2 of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010) prohibits exclusion of statutory consumer guarantees, which limits the effectiveness of consequential damages waivers in B2C transactions. In B2B transactions, the parties may exclude or limit consequential damages, but the exclusion must not be "unfair" under the unfair contract terms provisions (extended to small business contracts in 2016 and further expanded in 2022). Courts apply an approach similar to the UK's reasonableness test.

Related Clauses

• Limitation of Liability: While the consequential damages waiver eliminates certain types of damages, the liability cap limits the total dollar amount of direct damages recoverable.
• Indemnification Clause: Indemnification obligations are frequently carved out of the consequential damages waiver, creating a separate risk allocation for third-party claims.
• Liquidated Damages: Provides a predetermined damages amount as an alternative to proving actual damages, which can be useful when consequential damages are waived.
• Disclaimer Clause: Works with the consequential damages waiver to limit warranty claims and the damages available for warranty breaches.
• Warranty Clause: The scope of warranties directly affects what constitutes a breach and what damages flow from it, making the warranty and damages waiver provisions interdependent.

‍

This content is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Market data represents general trends and may vary by industry, jurisdiction, and deal size. Consult qualified legal counsel for specific contract matters.