Disclaimer Clause

Back to Clauses Guide

TL;DR: A disclaimer clause limits or excludes warranties, representations, or liabilities that would otherwise attach by law or implication. It protects the disclaiming party from claims arising from product defects, service failures, or reliance on information. Key variables include the types of warranties disclaimed (express vs. implied), the conspicuousness of the disclaimer, exclusions for fraud or willful misconduct, and compliance with UCC or consumer protection statutes.

What Is a Disclaimer Clause?

A disclaimer clause is a contractual provision in which one party expressly denies or limits responsibility for certain outcomes, warranties, or liabilities. At its core, it tells the other party: here is what we are not promising, and here is what we will not be held responsible for.

The most common disclaimers target implied warranties, particularly the UCC's implied warranty of merchantability (the product works for its ordinary purpose) and the implied warranty of fitness for a particular purpose (the product works for the buyer's specific use). Software licenses routinely disclaim both. The phrase "AS IS" has become shorthand for a comprehensive warranty disclaimer, though its legal effect varies by jurisdiction and context.

Disclaimers also appear as informational disclaimers (financial websites disclaiming investment advice), professional liability disclaimers (consultants limiting reliance on their reports), and product liability disclaimers (manufacturers warning against specific uses). Each operates under different legal frameworks. A disclaimer on a consumer product faces far more scrutiny than one in a negotiated B2B software agreement.

Related terms include "warranty exclusion," "limitation of warranties," and "no-warranty provision." Some practitioners distinguish disclaimers (which negate warranties before they arise) from limitations of liability (which cap damages after a claim arises), though the two often work in tandem.

Why It Matters

Disclaimers shift risk. A SaaS provider selling a $200K annual subscription faces potential exposure of millions in consequential damages if its platform goes down during a customer's peak revenue period. A well-drafted disclaimer caps that exposure to the contract value or less.

  • Financial exposure: Without a disclaimer of implied warranties, a $50K software license could expose the vendor to $5M in consequential damages if the software fails to perform. The disclaimer is the first line of defense.
  • Regulatory compliance: Consumer protection laws in many jurisdictions require specific language, formatting, and conspicuousness for disclaimers to be enforceable. The FTC, for example, requires disclaimers in advertising to be "clear and conspicuous" under its 2023 updated guidelines.
  • Deal velocity: Standardized disclaimer language reduces negotiation cycles. In SaaS transactions, vendors who offer market-standard disclaimers close deals 20-30% faster than those with aggressive positions that trigger redlines from every customer's legal team.

Key Elements of a Well-Drafted Disclaimer Clause

  1. Conspicuousness: Under UCC Section 2-316, disclaimers of implied warranties must be conspicuous, meaning a reasonable person would notice them. ALL CAPS, bold text, or separate signature blocks are standard approaches. Burying a disclaimer in 8-point font on page 47 of a contract is a recipe for unenforceability.
  2. Specificity of warranties disclaimed: Name the warranties you are disclaiming. "THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED 'AS IS' WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE." Generic language like "all warranties are disclaimed" may not survive judicial scrutiny.
  3. Carve-outs for express warranties: If the contract contains express representations or warranties elsewhere, the disclaimer should not contradict them. A contract that warrants 99.9% uptime in Section 3 and then disclaims "all warranties" in Section 8 creates ambiguity that courts will resolve against the disclaiming party.
  4. Exclusion of fraud and willful misconduct: No jurisdiction enforces a disclaimer that purports to shield a party from its own fraud, intentional misrepresentation, or willful misconduct. Including this carve-out expressly demonstrates good faith and avoids judicial hostility to the entire provision.
  5. Scope definition: Specify what the disclaimer covers: products, services, information, third-party components, or all of the above. A technology vendor that disclaims warranties on its own software but bundles third-party open-source libraries needs to address both.
  6. Consumer vs. commercial distinction: If the product or service reaches consumers, the disclaimer must comply with consumer protection statutes (Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act in the U.S., Consumer Rights Act 2015 in the UK). These laws sharply limit what can be disclaimed in consumer transactions. Keep B2B and B2C terms separate.
  7. Integration with limitation of liability: The disclaimer and the limitation of liability clause should work together. The disclaimer eliminates certain claims at the threshold; the limitation of liability caps damages on whatever claims survive. Draft both provisions with the same risk allocation framework.

Market Position & Benchmarks

Where Does Your Clause Fall?

  • Vendor-Favorable: Full disclaimer of all express and implied warranties, "AS IS" delivery with no warranty of uptime, performance, or accuracy, no carve-outs beyond fraud, and disclaimer extends to all third-party components and integrations.
  • Market Standard: Disclaimer of implied warranties (merchantability, fitness for particular purpose) with specific express warranties retained (e.g., material compliance with documentation, 99.5% uptime SLA), fraud and willful misconduct carve-outs, and reasonable warranty period (12 months).
  • Customer-Favorable: Limited disclaimer of implied warranties only to the extent permitted by law, broad express warranties covering performance, compatibility, and compliance, extended warranty period (24-36 months), and vendor obligation to cure defects before disclaimer applies.

Market Data

  • Over 95% of enterprise SaaS agreements disclaim implied warranties of merchantability and fitness for a particular purpose (SaaStr Benchmark Report, 2024).
  • Approximately 70% of SaaS vendors provide an express warranty of material conformity with documentation, even when disclaiming all implied warranties.
  • The average express warranty period in enterprise software contracts is 12 months, with 18-24 months common for deals over $500K ARR.
  • Courts invalidate disclaimer clauses in approximately 15-20% of litigated consumer cases, primarily for lack of conspicuousness or conflict with statutory consumer protections.
  • The Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act prohibits disclaiming implied warranties on consumer products if the seller provides any written warranty, affecting approximately 85% of consumer product contracts.
  • In B2B transactions, disclaimer clauses are challenged in litigation in less than 5% of cases, and upheld more than 80% of the time when challenged (Westlaw litigation data, 2023).

Sample Language by Position

Vendor-Favorable: "THE SERVICE IS PROVIDED 'AS IS' AND 'AS AVAILABLE.' VENDOR MAKES NO REPRESENTATIONS OR WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, TITLE, NON-INFRINGEMENT, ACCURACY, OR COMPLETENESS. VENDOR DOES NOT WARRANT THAT THE SERVICE WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED, ERROR-FREE, OR SECURE, OR THAT ANY DEFECTS WILL BE CORRECTED."
Market Standard: "EXCEPT AS EXPRESSLY SET FORTH IN THIS AGREEMENT, VENDOR DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES, WHETHER EXPRESS, IMPLIED, STATUTORY, OR OTHERWISE, INCLUDING WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Vendor warrants that the Service will materially conform to the Documentation during the Subscription Term and will use commercially reasonable efforts to correct any material non-conformity reported by Customer within the Warranty Period."
Customer-Favorable: "Vendor warrants that: (a) the Service will perform materially in accordance with the Documentation; (b) the Service will be compatible with Customer's systems as specified in the SOW; (c) Vendor will perform professional services in a workmanlike manner consistent with industry standards; and (d) the Service will comply with all applicable laws. TO THE EXTENT PERMITTED BY LAW, VENDOR DISCLAIMS ALL OTHER IMPLIED WARRANTIES NOT EXPRESSLY GRANTED HEREIN. For any breach of the foregoing warranties, Vendor shall, at its expense, promptly cure the non-conformity or, if cure is not commercially feasible, refund prepaid fees on a pro rata basis."

Example Clause Language

These examples show disclaimer provisions in different commercial contexts.

Software License Agreement: "EXCEPT FOR THE EXPRESS WARRANTIES IN SECTION 5, THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED 'AS IS' WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND. LICENSOR SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS ALL IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, AND NON-INFRINGEMENT. LICENSOR DOES NOT WARRANT THAT THE SOFTWARE WILL MEET LICENSEE'S REQUIREMENTS OR THAT OPERATION OF THE SOFTWARE WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED OR ERROR-FREE. This disclaimer shall not apply to Licensor's express warranty that the Software will materially conform to the functional specifications in Exhibit A for a period of twelve (12) months following delivery."
Professional Services Agreement: "Consultant disclaims all warranties, express or implied, regarding the deliverables, except that the services shall be performed in a professional and workmanlike manner consistent with generally accepted industry standards. Client acknowledges that the deliverables are based on information provided by Client, and Consultant makes no warranty regarding the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of Client-provided data. In no event shall Consultant be liable for any decision made or action taken by Client in reliance on the deliverables."
E-Commerce Terms of Service: "The information, products, and services available on this website are provided on an 'as is' and 'as available' basis. To the fullest extent permitted by applicable law, we disclaim all warranties, express or implied, including implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, and non-infringement. We do not warrant that the website will be available at all times or that the information contained herein is accurate, complete, or current. Nothing in this disclaimer limits your statutory rights as a consumer under applicable law."

Common Contract Types

  • Software license and SaaS agreements: Nearly universal disclaimer of implied warranties, often paired with limited express performance warranties.
  • Professional services and consulting agreements: Disclaimers of accuracy and completeness of deliverables, with retention of a "workmanlike manner" warranty.
  • Product purchase agreements: Disclaimers of implied warranties under UCC Article 2, subject to Magnuson-Moss constraints for consumer products.
  • Website terms of service: Broad disclaimers covering information accuracy, availability, and third-party content.
  • Financial and investment documents: Regulatory disclaimers required by SEC, FINRA, and equivalent bodies.
  • Real estate purchase agreements: "As is" disclaimers in property sales, subject to seller disclosure obligations.

Negotiation Playbook

Key Drafting Notes

  • Use ALL CAPS for implied warranty disclaimers in any contract governed by U.S. law. UCC Section 2-316(2) requires conspicuousness, and courts have invalidated disclaimers that blend into surrounding text. This is not optional formatting; it is a legal requirement in most states.
  • Do not disclaim express warranties made elsewhere in the contract. If Section 4 says "the product will pass all acceptance tests," Section 9 cannot disclaim "all express warranties." Courts resolve this conflict against the disclaiming party under the rule that specific provisions override general ones.
  • Build in a cure period before the disclaimer takes full effect. Customers accept "AS IS" more readily when the vendor first has an obligation to attempt to fix reported defects during a 30-60 day cure window.
  • Separate consumer terms from commercial terms. If your product serves both markets, maintain distinct disclaimer provisions. A disclaimer that is enforceable in a B2B context may violate consumer protection statutes and expose you to regulatory action.
  • Address third-party components explicitly. Modern software stacks incorporate dozens of open-source and third-party libraries. Disclaim warranties on those components separately, and ensure your upstream licenses permit you to redistribute them under the terms you are offering.
  • Include a mutual acknowledgment. Having both parties acknowledge the disclaimer (through a separate checkbox, initial, or signature line) strengthens enforceability. "Customer acknowledges that it has read and understood the warranty disclaimer in Section X" is a standard belt-and-suspenders approach.

Common Pitfalls

  • Failing to make the disclaimer conspicuous. Courts in New York, California, and Texas have all invalidated disclaimers that were not in ALL CAPS, bold, or otherwise visually distinct from surrounding text. This is the single most common reason disclaimers fail.
  • Contradicting the disclaimer with marketing materials. If sales collateral promises "guaranteed 99.99% uptime" but the contract disclaims all warranties, a court may treat the marketing materials as creating an express warranty that survives the disclaimer.
  • Attempting to disclaim liability for personal injury in a consumer product context. This is unenforceable in virtually every U.S. state and violates consumer protection laws in the EU, UK, and most other developed markets.
  • Overlooking state-specific anti-disclaimer statutes. Some states (e.g., Massachusetts under Chapter 93A) have laws that effectively prohibit certain warranty disclaimers in consumer contracts, regardless of how the disclaimer is drafted.
  • Using boilerplate from a different contract type. A real estate "AS IS" disclaimer operates under different legal principles than a UCC Article 2 warranty disclaimer. Transplanting one into the other's context creates gaps and ambiguities.

Jurisdiction Notes

United States: The UCC governs warranty disclaimers for goods (Article 2). Section 2-316 requires disclaimers of implied warranties to be conspicuous, and merchantability disclaimers must specifically mention "merchantability." For consumer products, the Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act (15 U.S.C. 2301-2312) prohibits disclaiming implied warranties if any written warranty is provided. State consumer protection statutes add additional layers. California's Song-Beverly Act, for instance, creates implied warranties on consumer goods that cannot be disclaimed. For services, common law governs, and implied warranty disclaimers are generally enforceable in negotiated commercial contracts.

United Kingdom: The Consumer Rights Act 2015 prohibits exclusion of implied terms (satisfactory quality, fitness for purpose, description conformity) in consumer contracts. The Unfair Contract Terms Act 1977 (UCTA) governs B2B disclaimers, subjecting them to a "reasonableness" test. Under UCTA, a clause that disclaims liability for negligence causing death or personal injury is void. For other losses, the disclaimer must satisfy the reasonableness test, considering the parties' bargaining power, availability of insurance, and industry practice. The Consumer Rights Act also restricts "unfair terms" in consumer contracts, and terms that are not individually negotiated are subject to a fairness test.

Germany: The German Civil Code (BGB) strictly limits warranty disclaimers. In consumer contracts (B2C), implied warranties for defects (Sachmangelgewahrleistung) cannot be disclaimed. In B2B contracts, disclaimers are permissible but must survive review under Sections 305-310 BGB (general terms and conditions). A disclaimer in standard terms that deviates significantly from statutory default rules is invalid. Individual negotiation of the disclaimer strengthens enforceability. German courts also apply the "surprising clause" doctrine, invalidating provisions that a reasonable party would not have expected in the contract.

Related Clauses

  • Warranty Clause: The disclaimer clause works in direct opposition to warranty provisions, defining what the seller or provider is not guaranteeing.
  • Limitation of Liability: While disclaimers eliminate certain claims, limitation of liability provisions cap the damages on claims that survive the disclaimer.
  • Exculpatory Clause: Broader than a disclaimer, an exculpatory clause attempts to release a party from liability for its own negligence or fault.
  • Indemnification Clause: Indemnification obligations interact with disclaimers; an indemnity for third-party IP claims may survive even a broad warranty disclaimer.
  • Reps & Warranties: Representations and warranties create the baseline commitments that disclaimers then carve back, making the interplay between these provisions critical to the risk allocation framework.

This content is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Market data represents general trends and may vary by industry, jurisdiction, and deal size. Consult qualified legal counsel for specific contract matters.

Related Clauses:

Use ContractKen to automatically flag risky language or missing clauses in your contracts, and redline directly inside Word